#27Title: NCES Seeks Comments on Proposal for Derived and Calculated Variables Prepared: November 2004 Type: Request for Feedback Summary The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is seeking comments on a proposal to develop new derived and calculated variables based on Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) data to address important policy issues. These new variables would be incorporated into the Peer Analysis System, and other IPEDS tools where appropriate (http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/trp6.asp). The NCES is concerned about how the calculation of these derived variables will impact the use of institutional data to inform policy. Interested parties should send any comments or concerns about this proposal to John Milam at jmilam@highered.org by December 1, 2004. Please include the following in the email subject line: Derived Variables TRP - Proposal Comments. Copies of your email also should be sent to Susan Broyles at Susan.Broyles@ed.gov. Current Status Two types of derived data are being considered: (1) subtotals of existing data; and (2) calculations of new data based on two or more existing variables. It is expected that these derived variables will be useful in addressing various current policy questions. The 23 new variables proposed for the first set to be developed are:
Implications for Institutions The availability of new derived data will make it quicker for users of the Peer Analysis System to get the data they need without having to make cumbersome calculations. Publication of these data on the IPEDS College Opportunities On Line (COOL) Web site could be of concern. Timeline December 1, 2004 - Deadline for submission of comments.Additional Resources The proposal is available at http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/trp6.asp. Complete information about IPEDS, including the Peer Analysis System (PAS) and the College Opportunities On Line (COOL) Web site is available at http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds. Author: Carol Fuller Coordinated by the Higher Education Data Policy Committee. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official position of the Association for Institutional Research. |