Background

The U.S. Department of Education has proposed a new IPEDS survey component—the Admissions and Consumer Transparency Supplement (ACTS)—in response to the August 7 Executive Action on higher-education admissions transparency. The Secretary of Education subsequently issued a directive detailing required data elements related to race, sex, academic credentials, and financial aid.

ACTS represents the most significant expansion of IPEDS reporting in recent years, and this page will be updated as new information and resources become available

The information on this page is offered as a resource for the higher education community. It is not intended to be official guidance or a substitute for information from the U.S. Department of Education.

Recently Released

Free Upcoming Events

Latest Resources from the U.S. Department of Education

On November 14, the Department released additional information on the proposed IPEDS ACTS survey component as part of a Federal Register notice (Docket: ED-2025-SCC-0382). The release includes several parts posted on the Regulations.gov page for this docket. Key sections related to the ACTS data collection are linked below.

  • Authorization Request to OMB (Docket: ED-2025-SCC-0382)
  • ACTS Package (Instructions, File Specifications, Codebook)
    • Available on the Regulations.gov Forms and Instruments tab
    • Look for: ACTS_package_102925 (Downloads as: ED-2025-SCC-0382-3466_attachment_13)
  • Draft Communications to Institutions
    • Available on the Regulations.gov Forms and Instruments tab
    • Look for: Appendix_B_Communications_ACTS_change_package_102925 (Downloads as: ED-2025-SCC-0382-3466_attachment_15)
  • Department Responses to 60-Day Comments
    • Available on the Regulations.gov Forms and Instruments tab
    • Look for: Appendix_E_FRN_60-day_Comment_Responses_102925 (Downloads as: ED-2025-SCC-0382-3466_attachment_18)

AIR Responses and Resources

Summary

Education

  • Navigating in Uncertainty: How to Prepare for ACTS Recorded Wednesday, November 20, 2025
    This free session focuses on what institutions can do today to prepare for ACTS: identifying available data, documenting gaps, and developing a feasible plan for compliant reporting as requirements are finalized.

Resources Extracted from ED Materials

  • Copy of ACTS code book (extracted from ED-2025-SCC-0382-3466_attachment_13)
  • ACTS FAQ (extracted from ED-2025-SCC-0382-3466_attachment_13)

Voices from the Field

Following the August 15 Federal Register notice on proposed ACTS data elements, AIR partnered with AACRAO, ACE, APLU, and NAICU to survey higher education professionals and capture campus perspectives. More than 580 colleagues provided candid feedback on feasibility, challenges, and potential value, highlighting where the proposal needs refinement and what support institutions will require.

AIR and its partners used these insights to shape the comments submitted in October, and AIR continues to draw on the findings to equip members with the tools and training needed to respond effectively.

Community Survey Results: Feedback on the August 15 ACTS proposal

Official Comments

AIR’s comments (PDF) submitted to the Federal Register on 10/14/2025


Inside Higher Education Op-Ed

Proposals Risk Making Admissions Data Unreliable (opinion) Bryan Cook & Christine Keller

Articles from AIR

  • Featured
  • 09.16.25

AIR Executive Director Weighs In: Proposed IPEDS Supplement Could Undermine Reliability of Admissions Data

  • by AIR

In an Inside Higher Ed opinion piece published September 15, 2025, Bryan Cook, vice president of data and policy analysis at the American Council on Education, and Christine M. Keller, executive director and CEO of the Association for Institutional Research (AIR), warn that the Department of Education’s proposed Admissions and Consumer Transparency Supplement (ACTS)—a new component of IPEDS—risks producing admissions data that are unreliable and misleading, unless major revisions are made.

Key Concerns

  • Ambitious timeline & scope: The proposal would require institutions with “selective admissions” to submit detailed data (including five years of historical data) by December 5—despite many colleges lacking that full historical record.
  • Methodological challenges: Graduate admissions data are decentralized and vary widely across programs, making institutional-level reporting misleading. Many of the proposed data elements (e.g. parental education, consistent GPA measures) are not routinely collected.
  • Data comparability & definitions: Without consistent definitions and reporting standards, institutions may interpret and report data differently, undercutting comparability.
  • Privacy & burden: Breaking out data by multiple demographic and performance categories multiplies complexity, increases the burden on institutional researchers, and raises privacy concerns (especially at smaller institutions).

Cook and Keller argue for a phased approach: start with a narrower set of data elements (e.g. race, sex) using clear definitions, allow institutions time to stabilize reporting systems, and build toward more complex data collection only when systems and standards are ready.

By prioritizing data quality and reporting feasibility over speed and volume, they contend that the Department of Education can better serve students, families, and policy makers—without overtaxing the IR/IE professionals who enable these data collections.

Stay up-to-date on this topic at airweb.org/ACTS.

Hub

Tap into the collective wisdom of the AIR community on AIR Hub. Sign in to browse recent posts for helpful discussions on ACTS.